This is a picture of the dry rot repairs occurring at Building O.
This is the official web blog for Kenthill Townhomes. We are near SE 256th St and 108 Ave SE in Kent, WA 98030. The purpose of this webblog is to improve communication at Kenthill Townhomes. I will be posting information, questions & answers, and photographs. Be sure to click on "Archives" for previous months postings. This website was first installed in 2005. It being 2010, I felt it was time to make some upgrades (style, color, format, etc.). Try using the new search field!
Search this blog!
Tuesday, June 01, 2010
Saturday, May 15, 2010
2010 dry rot repairs
Significant dry rot continues to be discovered at our buildings. In order to address this dry rot (where the roof line meets the vertical wood siding on the building), wood siding repairs are being accomplished at Buildings M, K, and O. This is a picture of the dry rot repairs occurring at Building M.
Saturday, May 01, 2010
Paint job in the future
Friday, April 23, 2010
Tree trimming
Pre-arraigned agreements govern the division of expenses with respect to shared roadways and recreational facilities for Easthill Apartments and Kenthill Townhomes. Generally speaking, Easthill pays 60% and Kenthill Townhomes pays 40% of all shared invoices. Trimming of trees along shared roadways is considered a shared expense.
Thursday, April 22, 2010
Free doors
Free louvered doors. These are from downstairs at my condo. The two on the left are from the downstairs storage area. The one on the right is from the downstairs closet area (the measurements are: 29 3/4” wide X 78 3/4” high). They are, “unfinished”. They would look even better, if they were stained (or even painted). I am at Unit J-4. Knock on my door or leave me a note, if you are interested. Otherwise, they’re going to be discarded.
[Update, 04-23-2010: Someone came and got them. Thanks].
Friday, April 02, 2010
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
Beauty bark applied today
Barking will occur today. Please move any plants, etc., so that they do not get bark on them.
Saturday, March 27, 2010
Handed out at the Annual Meeting, and discussed.
The following is an excerpt from the 2010 Annual Meeting Handout:
Kenthill Townhomes has had many difficulties and has faced several challenges in the last twelve months. The Board of Directors has been very busy addressing these various issues. Below is an abbreviated list of projects and ongoing projects accomplished in 2009 and early 2010. [Further details concerning these projects may be obtained by viewing the webblog at http://kenthillwebblog.blogspot.com].
1. Worked with certified public accountant to assist in the completion of the required 2008 audit; audit is pending but should be completed by the end of the year.
2. Continuing to work with our neighbors on all sides to regarding various issues including trespasser and fence problems.
3. In order to address dry rot problems (where the roof line meets the vertical wood siding on the building), wood siding repairs were accomplished. Since 2005, work has occurred at Buildings A, B, J, L, N, P, Q, R, C, E, D, and I.
4. Worked with plumbing contractors to address a number of significant (and costly) plumbing problems; these included major water leaks. Since 2005, repairs to water valves have occurred at Buildings A, B, C, D, E, I, J, L, and O.
5. Worked with contractors to have all chimneys inspected and cleaned as necessary.
6. Working with contractors to have all dryer vents inspected, cleaned, and repaired as necessary.
7. Continued repairs to outside water faucet hose bibs.
8. Cleaned gutters and downspouts on all 15 buildings.
9. Worked to address the ongoing issues surrounding delinquencies and foreclosures.
10. Coordinated with Easthill Apts. to assist contractors in the installation of new asphalt at the southeast corner of the complex.
11. Worked with contractors to install new gutters and downspouts on all buildings that have had new roofs installed since the Roofing Project began in 2003. New gutters and downspouts will be completed at the conclusion of each remaining roof installation from this point forward.
The long term projects of Kenthill Townhomes have been reviewed. Kenthill Townhomes received a painting job in 2002 (it was of poor quality). Another painting project will need to be scheduled in the future, but sooner than within a 15 year time span (well before 2017). The window replacement project has also been put on hold indefinitely. Beginning in 2003, we have been replacing roofs, two roofs each year. All scheduling of these projects are now under review. Over the past several years, we have found increasing amounts of serious dry rot on all of our buildings. As the Budget has allowed, repairs have occurred at Buildings A, B, J, L, N, P, Q, R. C, E, D, and I.
Each year since 2005, we include in the upcoming Budget the continued commitment to have two roofs installed each year (until all 15 buildings are completed) as well as the installation of gutters & downspouts at these buildings. As covered at the 2008 Annual Meeting, the Board has discussed plans to begin the replacement of all the windows in all the buildings (some already have been replaced by individual unit owners in past years), one building a year, until all 15 buildings are completed, at the conclusion of the Roofing Project. However, as mentioned above, these plans have been put on hold, as significant dry rot discoveries and their related repairs have taken precedence.
Kenthill Townhomes has had many difficulties and has faced several challenges in the last twelve months. The Board of Directors has been very busy addressing these various issues. Below is an abbreviated list of projects and ongoing projects accomplished in 2009 and early 2010. [Further details concerning these projects may be obtained by viewing the webblog at http://kenthillwebblog.blogspot.com].
1. Worked with certified public accountant to assist in the completion of the required 2008 audit; audit is pending but should be completed by the end of the year.
2. Continuing to work with our neighbors on all sides to regarding various issues including trespasser and fence problems.
3. In order to address dry rot problems (where the roof line meets the vertical wood siding on the building), wood siding repairs were accomplished. Since 2005, work has occurred at Buildings A, B, J, L, N, P, Q, R, C, E, D, and I.
4. Worked with plumbing contractors to address a number of significant (and costly) plumbing problems; these included major water leaks. Since 2005, repairs to water valves have occurred at Buildings A, B, C, D, E, I, J, L, and O.
5. Worked with contractors to have all chimneys inspected and cleaned as necessary.
6. Working with contractors to have all dryer vents inspected, cleaned, and repaired as necessary.
7. Continued repairs to outside water faucet hose bibs.
8. Cleaned gutters and downspouts on all 15 buildings.
9. Worked to address the ongoing issues surrounding delinquencies and foreclosures.
10. Coordinated with Easthill Apts. to assist contractors in the installation of new asphalt at the southeast corner of the complex.
11. Worked with contractors to install new gutters and downspouts on all buildings that have had new roofs installed since the Roofing Project began in 2003. New gutters and downspouts will be completed at the conclusion of each remaining roof installation from this point forward.
The long term projects of Kenthill Townhomes have been reviewed. Kenthill Townhomes received a painting job in 2002 (it was of poor quality). Another painting project will need to be scheduled in the future, but sooner than within a 15 year time span (well before 2017). The window replacement project has also been put on hold indefinitely. Beginning in 2003, we have been replacing roofs, two roofs each year. All scheduling of these projects are now under review. Over the past several years, we have found increasing amounts of serious dry rot on all of our buildings. As the Budget has allowed, repairs have occurred at Buildings A, B, J, L, N, P, Q, R. C, E, D, and I.
Each year since 2005, we include in the upcoming Budget the continued commitment to have two roofs installed each year (until all 15 buildings are completed) as well as the installation of gutters & downspouts at these buildings. As covered at the 2008 Annual Meeting, the Board has discussed plans to begin the replacement of all the windows in all the buildings (some already have been replaced by individual unit owners in past years), one building a year, until all 15 buildings are completed, at the conclusion of the Roofing Project. However, as mentioned above, these plans have been put on hold, as significant dry rot discoveries and their related repairs have taken precedence.
Wednesday, March 03, 2010
2010 Annual Meeting
The 2010 Kenthill Townhomes Annual Meeting will be held at 7:00PM in the Cabana on March 22, 2010. Homeowners are urged to sign proxies if they are unable to attend. Homeowners may wish to re-read the December 2008 Newsletter (additional copies may be found on the doorstep of Unit J-4).
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Wednesday, January 06, 2010
Re-printing of a newsletter
The following is a re-printing of a newsletter that was distributed in July of 2008:
JULY NEWSLETTER
An article appeared in the Seattle Times newspaper on April 27, 2008 which should be read and understood by all homeowners. [It is reproduced here in its entirety without editing and by permission from the Seattle Times]. In light of the passage of this new law by the legislature, the Executive Summary of the Reserve Study completed for Kenthill Townhomes in 2006 is included in this handout. Certain sections of the Executive Summary [which are in brackets] have sentences added for clarification. Also included is a reprinting of the cover letter from the Kenthill Board of Directors regarding the Executive Summary, dated September 7, 2006.
The Reserve Study is a very large document. Preparing it took many months and many hours of interaction, feedback, studying, and information gathering on the part of the vendor, countless contractors, and question and answer sessions with Board members. Having said that, the Reserve Study is only a guide. It is a very useful guide, but only a guide. It does not dictate, nor will it dictate, future actions and decisions. It came with useful tools which can be used to manipulate data to produce various current and future outcomes. The Board has spent many hours reviewing the document. It has proved to be very helpful in the short time that it has been implemented in assisting with composing a rough draft of future projects and issues which will need to be considered in the short term future and the long term future.
That said, this is the law in Washington State now.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Sunday, April 27, 2008 - Page updated at 12:00 AM
Permission to reprint or copy this article or photo, other than personal use, must be obtained from The Seattle Times. Call 206-464-3113 or e-mail resale@seattletimes.com with your request.
New state law requires condo associations to report money set aside for long-term maintenance
By Elizabeth Rhodes
Seattle Times business reporter
Attention, condominium shoppers: Washington soon will become one of a half-dozen states requiring condo associations to provide a financial-wellness check that can predict whether the place is a potential money pit.
The check, called a reserve study, estimates how much money an association must set aside to pay for expensive long-term maintenance, such as repaving a parking lot, replacing a roof or rebuilding rotting decks.
Although many associations require reserve studies, many have ignored their own requirements, local condo experts say. That will have to change June 12, when updates to the state's condo law take effect and associations must prepare and annually update such a study and make it available to buyers.
Calling it the "biggest thing to happen since the Condominium Act of 1990 was passed," longtime condo attorney Kris Sundberg says the new provisions will address "the dirty little secret of the condo world: Most condos are severely underfunded."
However, what the law does not do is to require that associations actually save the money their study finds is needed to cover future maintenance. Laws in a few states, including Hawaii, do.
"While this law may not put Washington in the vanguard, it clearly puts them toward the top of the list in being progressive on the issue," says Frank Rathbun, of the Community Associations Institute, a national nonprofit educational organization for homeowners associations and their members.
The reserve study must be done by a professional and can be waived only if it would "impose an unreasonable hardship," something the law does not define. Still, the associations group, condo attorneys and property managers call the change necessary, if somewhat overdue, for a growing segment of the housing market. A quarter of King County home sales are condos, and many buyers are homeowner novices.
"It will act as consumer protection for a lot of potential buyers and give them a better perspective of the true costs of ownership in a condominium association," says Marshall Johnson, president of The CWD Group, which manages about 90 condo associations in Seattle and Bellevue.
Sundberg, of Mercer Island, says that's been sorely lacking.
"We're seeing a substantial increase in litigation from unhappy purchasers who bought a condo then found out there's a huge special assessment being levied," he says. These irate buyers "go after the board, the manager, the real-estate agents, the seller," he says.
Considered a one-time cost to pay for major repairs, a special assessment is what associations turn to when they haven't built sufficient long-term savings in what's called a reserve account.
The account is separate from the annual budget, which pays for regular, ongoing expenses such as insurance.
When a special assessment is levied, owners are billed for their portions.
"We regularly see assessments in the $60,000 to $80,000 range per unit," Sundberg says. "Most condominium associations have neither a current reserve study nor adequately funded reserves."
That wouldn't surprise Jim Talaga, president of Association Reserves Washington, a reserve-study provider. Many 20-year-old communities have had little serious maintenance, he says.
An older 50-unit building could face $200,000 for a new roof and $70,000 for new exterior paint — with no money set aside to pay for them.
A first-time reserve study, on the other hand, costs about $2,500, although that depends a lot on the size of the community, Talaga says.
Matt Reed had first-hand experience with the reserves issue when he served on the board of a South Everett condominium. His underfunded complex faced at least $1 million in serious repairs because of delayed maintenance," he says.
The root of the problem, Reed says, was a membership of mostly first-time owners who hadn't made the mental transition from apartment dweller to homeowner.
"They were trying to defer all the responsibility and remain renters," he says.
After the board voted to levy a substantial special assessment, a group of angry owners successfully voted to override it, and the work went undone.
Faced with an emotionally draining stalemate, Reed sold his condo and bought a house.
The new law will make it harder for condo associations to conceal from buyers a lack of long-term financial planning. Those that use the hardship exemption to forgo a reserve study must disclose that to prospective buyers along with this warning:
"The lack of a current reserve study poses certain risks to you, the purchaser. Insufficient reserves may, under some circumstances, require you to pay" a special assessment.
Sundberg thinks having that in print may dissuade some buyers and lenders from investing in underfunded condos.
It will also affect their prices, Johnson predicts. "The unit that has minimal reserves is going to be cheaper than one with high reserves, so what they're saving by not putting into reserves will be lost in the price they get for it," Johnson says.
Once associations realize the true cost of scrimping on savings, reserve accounts will grow and the problem will correct itself, Sundberg says.
Meanwhile a real concern for associations is finding a qualified pro to do a reserve study. Several firms exist locally, but demand may overwhelm supply as associations attempt to comply with the new law.
Condo lawyer Brian McLean, of Leahy.ps in Kirkland, worked on the law's passage. He recommends that associations address this issue in their next budget cycle, research whether a reserve specialist is available and find out what the cost will be.
"This is a great planning tool, but no one wants this to cause a sense of undue urgency," McLean says. "I'm comfortable saying everyone has time to do this and do it right."
……………………………………………………………………………………………….
JULY NEWSLETTER
An article appeared in the Seattle Times newspaper on April 27, 2008 which should be read and understood by all homeowners. [It is reproduced here in its entirety without editing and by permission from the Seattle Times]. In light of the passage of this new law by the legislature, the Executive Summary of the Reserve Study completed for Kenthill Townhomes in 2006 is included in this handout. Certain sections of the Executive Summary [which are in brackets] have sentences added for clarification. Also included is a reprinting of the cover letter from the Kenthill Board of Directors regarding the Executive Summary, dated September 7, 2006.
The Reserve Study is a very large document. Preparing it took many months and many hours of interaction, feedback, studying, and information gathering on the part of the vendor, countless contractors, and question and answer sessions with Board members. Having said that, the Reserve Study is only a guide. It is a very useful guide, but only a guide. It does not dictate, nor will it dictate, future actions and decisions. It came with useful tools which can be used to manipulate data to produce various current and future outcomes. The Board has spent many hours reviewing the document. It has proved to be very helpful in the short time that it has been implemented in assisting with composing a rough draft of future projects and issues which will need to be considered in the short term future and the long term future.
That said, this is the law in Washington State now.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Sunday, April 27, 2008 - Page updated at 12:00 AM
Permission to reprint or copy this article or photo, other than personal use, must be obtained from The Seattle Times. Call 206-464-3113 or e-mail resale@seattletimes.com with your request.
New state law requires condo associations to report money set aside for long-term maintenance
By Elizabeth Rhodes
Seattle Times business reporter
Attention, condominium shoppers: Washington soon will become one of a half-dozen states requiring condo associations to provide a financial-wellness check that can predict whether the place is a potential money pit.
The check, called a reserve study, estimates how much money an association must set aside to pay for expensive long-term maintenance, such as repaving a parking lot, replacing a roof or rebuilding rotting decks.
Although many associations require reserve studies, many have ignored their own requirements, local condo experts say. That will have to change June 12, when updates to the state's condo law take effect and associations must prepare and annually update such a study and make it available to buyers.
Calling it the "biggest thing to happen since the Condominium Act of 1990 was passed," longtime condo attorney Kris Sundberg says the new provisions will address "the dirty little secret of the condo world: Most condos are severely underfunded."
However, what the law does not do is to require that associations actually save the money their study finds is needed to cover future maintenance. Laws in a few states, including Hawaii, do.
"While this law may not put Washington in the vanguard, it clearly puts them toward the top of the list in being progressive on the issue," says Frank Rathbun, of the Community Associations Institute, a national nonprofit educational organization for homeowners associations and their members.
The reserve study must be done by a professional and can be waived only if it would "impose an unreasonable hardship," something the law does not define. Still, the associations group, condo attorneys and property managers call the change necessary, if somewhat overdue, for a growing segment of the housing market. A quarter of King County home sales are condos, and many buyers are homeowner novices.
"It will act as consumer protection for a lot of potential buyers and give them a better perspective of the true costs of ownership in a condominium association," says Marshall Johnson, president of The CWD Group, which manages about 90 condo associations in Seattle and Bellevue.
Sundberg, of Mercer Island, says that's been sorely lacking.
"We're seeing a substantial increase in litigation from unhappy purchasers who bought a condo then found out there's a huge special assessment being levied," he says. These irate buyers "go after the board, the manager, the real-estate agents, the seller," he says.
Considered a one-time cost to pay for major repairs, a special assessment is what associations turn to when they haven't built sufficient long-term savings in what's called a reserve account.
The account is separate from the annual budget, which pays for regular, ongoing expenses such as insurance.
When a special assessment is levied, owners are billed for their portions.
"We regularly see assessments in the $60,000 to $80,000 range per unit," Sundberg says. "Most condominium associations have neither a current reserve study nor adequately funded reserves."
That wouldn't surprise Jim Talaga, president of Association Reserves Washington, a reserve-study provider. Many 20-year-old communities have had little serious maintenance, he says.
An older 50-unit building could face $200,000 for a new roof and $70,000 for new exterior paint — with no money set aside to pay for them.
A first-time reserve study, on the other hand, costs about $2,500, although that depends a lot on the size of the community, Talaga says.
Matt Reed had first-hand experience with the reserves issue when he served on the board of a South Everett condominium. His underfunded complex faced at least $1 million in serious repairs because of delayed maintenance," he says.
The root of the problem, Reed says, was a membership of mostly first-time owners who hadn't made the mental transition from apartment dweller to homeowner.
"They were trying to defer all the responsibility and remain renters," he says.
After the board voted to levy a substantial special assessment, a group of angry owners successfully voted to override it, and the work went undone.
Faced with an emotionally draining stalemate, Reed sold his condo and bought a house.
The new law will make it harder for condo associations to conceal from buyers a lack of long-term financial planning. Those that use the hardship exemption to forgo a reserve study must disclose that to prospective buyers along with this warning:
"The lack of a current reserve study poses certain risks to you, the purchaser. Insufficient reserves may, under some circumstances, require you to pay" a special assessment.
Sundberg thinks having that in print may dissuade some buyers and lenders from investing in underfunded condos.
It will also affect their prices, Johnson predicts. "The unit that has minimal reserves is going to be cheaper than one with high reserves, so what they're saving by not putting into reserves will be lost in the price they get for it," Johnson says.
Once associations realize the true cost of scrimping on savings, reserve accounts will grow and the problem will correct itself, Sundberg says.
Meanwhile a real concern for associations is finding a qualified pro to do a reserve study. Several firms exist locally, but demand may overwhelm supply as associations attempt to comply with the new law.
Condo lawyer Brian McLean, of Leahy.ps in Kirkland, worked on the law's passage. He recommends that associations address this issue in their next budget cycle, research whether a reserve specialist is available and find out what the cost will be.
"This is a great planning tool, but no one wants this to cause a sense of undue urgency," McLean says. "I'm comfortable saying everyone has time to do this and do it right."
……………………………………………………………………………………………….
Sunday, December 13, 2009
Fire extinguisher instructions
Fire extinguisher instructions are easy. Remember the anacronym, "PASS".
"P" stands for "pull" - hold upright, and pull the safety pin.
"A" stands for "aim" - start back 8 - 10 feet, and aim at the base of the fire.
"S" stands for "squeeze" - squeeze the lever on the fire extinguisher.
"S" stands for "sweep" - while aiming and squeezing, sweep side to side, to put out the fire.
"A" stands for "aim" - start back 8 - 10 feet, and aim at the base of the fire.
"S" stands for "squeeze" - squeeze the lever on the fire extinguisher.
"S" stands for "sweep" - while aiming and squeezing, sweep side to side, to put out the fire.
Saturday, October 10, 2009
Plant life
Monday, September 21, 2009
Attention condo buyers
The following is directed towards potential condo buyers at Kenthill Townhomes:
Statements have been made and some statements have been written to the effect that only half of Kenthill Townhomes homeowners are paying their dues. These statements are not based on any facts. Please ask your real estate agent to investigate these statements. By contacting Suhrco Residential Properties, Inc. and requesting the appropriate official Lender Questionaires, Resale Certificates, etc., you will discover that these claims are unfounded.
Speculative statements such as these only make it more difficult for homeowners who are struggling and are trying to be responsible and who are attempting to sell their Units and move on to alternative living situations.
Situations in which homeowners who are delinquent in their homeowners dues are dealt with with privacy, confidentiality, and respect, in accordance with the Kenthill Townhomes Homeowners Declarations, and according to the laws of Washington State, which include liens, foreclosures, Sheriffs Sales, and Trustees Sales, and all of these official processes must work their way through the King County Court system (a very, very lengthly, and time consuming process).
Statements have been made and some statements have been written to the effect that only half of Kenthill Townhomes homeowners are paying their dues. These statements are not based on any facts. Please ask your real estate agent to investigate these statements. By contacting Suhrco Residential Properties, Inc. and requesting the appropriate official Lender Questionaires, Resale Certificates, etc., you will discover that these claims are unfounded.
Speculative statements such as these only make it more difficult for homeowners who are struggling and are trying to be responsible and who are attempting to sell their Units and move on to alternative living situations.
Situations in which homeowners who are delinquent in their homeowners dues are dealt with with privacy, confidentiality, and respect, in accordance with the Kenthill Townhomes Homeowners Declarations, and according to the laws of Washington State, which include liens, foreclosures, Sheriffs Sales, and Trustees Sales, and all of these official processes must work their way through the King County Court system (a very, very lengthly, and time consuming process).
Sunday, September 06, 2009
Satellite installation rules
The Kenthill Townhomes Rules & Regulations with respect to satellite dishes are as follows:
9.9 The Rules and Regulations concerning no alterations to the Common Area or Limited Common Areas and/or exterior appearances without prior approval of the Board extends to and includes satellite dish placement. Satellite dish placement is not prohibited, but their placement is permitted to be regulated in accordance with Federal Law.
Satellite installations at Kenthill Townhomes are typically occurring on the privacy fences or on metal stands.
For more information on this subject, go to:
http://kenthillwebblog.blogspot.com/search?q=satellite
9.9 The Rules and Regulations concerning no alterations to the Common Area or Limited Common Areas and/or exterior appearances without prior approval of the Board extends to and includes satellite dish placement. Satellite dish placement is not prohibited, but their placement is permitted to be regulated in accordance with Federal Law.
Satellite installations at Kenthill Townhomes are typically occurring on the privacy fences or on metal stands.
For more information on this subject, go to:
http://kenthillwebblog.blogspot.com/search?q=satellite
Saturday, August 29, 2009
Northwest cotton wood tree
Our neighboring condominium complex, Highland Park, which is located at the northwest corner of our property plat, has recently cut down the large cotton wood tree that was in their backyard (the branches of this tree had been a safety issue, as many of them used to overhang onto the Kenthill Townhomes driveway, near Building P). The top photo was taken in 2009; the bottom photo was taken in 2008.
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
Mailing mistake
There was a mis-communication between our property manager and a new assistant at Suhrco Residential Properties, Inc. (Suhrco is the property management company for Kenthill Townhomes). The January, February, and March homeowners meeting minutes were mistakenly mailed out to all 82 Kenthill Townhomes homeowners (these were already mailed out in early April). There will be no charge to Kenthill's Operating Account for this error.
In a few days the April, May, and June homeowners meeting minutes will be mailed to all 82 Kenthill Townhomes homeowners. [Two other items will also be included in the mailing. Homeowners will wish to read them carefully].
In a few days the April, May, and June homeowners meeting minutes will be mailed to all 82 Kenthill Townhomes homeowners. [Two other items will also be included in the mailing. Homeowners will wish to read them carefully].
Monday, July 20, 2009
Status of the SE 256th St. LID
Early this year, the City of Kent proposed the formation of a Local Improvement District (LID) for the purpose of funding the S.E 256th Street Widening Project. Letters were sent to affected homeowners at Kenthill Townhomes, homeowners of ordinary houses, and most apartment owners (Easthill Apartments was included) whose residences are on or near S.E. 256th Street. [According to mailed paperwork and maps, certain particular apartments were excluded, having signed a previous agreement when constructed]. Letters were later sent which stated the predicted amount that each affected homeowners or apartment owner would be expected to pay to the City of Kent.
As you may remember from the Annual Meeting, one of homeowners at Kenthill Townhomes volunteered to head up a committee to organize homeowners at Kenthill Townhomes as well as homeowners of houses and owners of apartments whose residences are on or near S.E. 256th Street in order to gather opposition to the City of Kent's Proposed Local Improvement District.
The City of Kent held informational meetings concerning the proposal. Statements in letters and at these meetings included the fact that unless a 60% opposition from affected homeowners was achieved, and this needed and was required to be in verifiable writings, from every homeowner and/or apartment owner, that the City of Kent was going to go ahead and proceed with the Proposed Local Improvement District and begin assessing these citizens for the monies to fund this project.
The committee has recently concluded their work concerning this issue. The Kenthill Townhomes Board has received written confirmation of the success of this effort. Last week, the committee that was formed to oppose this Proposed Local Improvement District presented the City of Kent with a cover letter and documentation, including signed letters and petitions, indicating to officials, clerks, attorneys, city council members, and the mayor, which demonstrated that a 67% opposition vote to the proposed LID had been achieved.
According to calculations which were studied, by defeating this proposed LID, the residents of Kenthill Townhomes (alone) have saved slightly less than $171,000.00. Members of the committee that was led by the above mentioned Kenthill Townhomes homeowner have spent considerable time and effort to reach this goal. To say that they deserve our appreciation would be an understatement. On behalf of every homeowner belonging to the Kenthill Townhomes Homeowners Association, both onsite and offsite, the members of the Kenthill Townhomes Board would like to thank the members of this committee for their diligence in seeing this endeavor through to its completion.
Friday, July 03, 2009
Wednesday, July 01, 2009
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
Frost free
Most of the hose bibs at Kenthill Townhomes are ordinary, standard, non frost free hose bibs. Over the past thirty years, when there was a problem with these hose bibs, such as when they leaked, etc., they were replaced. Some of these were just replaced by ordinary, standard, non frost free hose bibs. But others were replaced by the better, but more expensive frost free hose bibs. These new exterior faucets are “frost-free” meaning the shut off, or point in which water is not exposed to the exterior elements, is within the insulated portions of the house, or in our case, condo, thus minimizing the potential of the faucet to freeze. If the hose bib is of the frost free variety, the process of turning the water on and off drains the remaining small amount of water in the system, and this occurs every time the valve is closed, as the stop itself is located 12 inches or more away from the spout. That distance is usually always inside a wall in a heated space. No additional freeze protection is required.
However, these new frost free hose bibs are not without their faults. They can and do fail, and when this happens, it is almost always because the homeowner did not disconnect and remove the garden hose from the hose bib. Even when this happens during the winter months, garden hoses, having been disconnected by Board members or nearby homeowners, are often reattached by other homeowners to wash their vehicles or to water their plants. Then these garden hoses are not disconnected when they are done. This condition is the Achilles heel of these new frost free hose bibs: All garden hoses must remain disconnected from them during cold weather, otherwise the frost free feature of these hose bibs is defeated; it is simply the way they operate and how they are engineered to work. A garden hose will cause a frost free hose bib to freeze when the water in the garden hose freezes.
[Also, a related piece of information is that the average plumbing company today charges $250 per hour. Not only is this a factor, but this particular task of installing a new frost free hose bib usually (but not always) involves acquiring access to the interior of the Unit. All obstructions, such as hot water heaters or appliances, etc., must be moved out of the way. Then the dry wall or sheetrock inside the Unit must be cut in order for wrenches to be applied to the pipe on the other (the interior) side of the wall, as well as to the hose bib, located on the outside of the wall. Later the dry wall must be repaired, mudded, sanded, and painted. Historically, over the years when this type of project has been undertaken, the total project costs have proven to be very expensive].
However, these new frost free hose bibs are not without their faults. They can and do fail, and when this happens, it is almost always because the homeowner did not disconnect and remove the garden hose from the hose bib. Even when this happens during the winter months, garden hoses, having been disconnected by Board members or nearby homeowners, are often reattached by other homeowners to wash their vehicles or to water their plants. Then these garden hoses are not disconnected when they are done. This condition is the Achilles heel of these new frost free hose bibs: All garden hoses must remain disconnected from them during cold weather, otherwise the frost free feature of these hose bibs is defeated; it is simply the way they operate and how they are engineered to work. A garden hose will cause a frost free hose bib to freeze when the water in the garden hose freezes.
[Also, a related piece of information is that the average plumbing company today charges $250 per hour. Not only is this a factor, but this particular task of installing a new frost free hose bib usually (but not always) involves acquiring access to the interior of the Unit. All obstructions, such as hot water heaters or appliances, etc., must be moved out of the way. Then the dry wall or sheetrock inside the Unit must be cut in order for wrenches to be applied to the pipe on the other (the interior) side of the wall, as well as to the hose bib, located on the outside of the wall. Later the dry wall must be repaired, mudded, sanded, and painted. Historically, over the years when this type of project has been undertaken, the total project costs have proven to be very expensive].
Saturday, June 13, 2009
Pest control
Due to economic reasons, the contract with Willards Pest Control, Inc. (the contractor that has been used by Kenthill Townhomes for over a decade to address pest issues. such as ants) was cancelled in late 2007. Homeowners are encouraged to use the many aftermarket products available at local hardware stores to deal with problems with insects, such as ants.
Friday, June 05, 2009
2009 Driveway improvement (Part 1)
In 2008, the strip of shared driveway that lies east and west on the property (this is S.E. 254th Pl.) was resurfaced with new asphalt at a cost of approximately $15,500.
In 2009, additional asphalt driveway resurfacing will occur (see the post dated May 20, 2009 for additional information) near Building I and Building R. The square footage of these two areas to be done in 2009 is approximately twice that of the area resurfaced in 2008.
[Maintenance of these items is considered a shared expense under the Joint Access and Easement Agreement of 1976 signed by both Kenthill Townhomes and Easthill Apartments. Easthill Apartments share is 60%. Kenthill Townhomes share is 40%.].
Wednesday, June 03, 2009
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
2009 dry rot repairs
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
Asphalt maintenance 2009
The Kenthill Townhomes Board has been informed by the owner of Easthill Apartments, Hume Investments, LLC., that asphalt maintenance will occur within the next few months. Asphalt resurfacing will occur at the south shared driveway area. This includes the area which lies east and west between 108th Avenue SE & 106th Avenue SE, just south and in front of Building I. Asphalt resurfacing will also occur at the southwest shared driveway area. This includes the area which lies along 106th Avenue SE, just southwest of Building R.
[Maintenance of these items is considered a shared expense under the Joint Access and Easement Agreement of 1976 signed by both Kenthill Townhomes and Easthill Apts.].
[Maintenance of these items is considered a shared expense under the Joint Access and Easement Agreement of 1976 signed by both Kenthill Townhomes and Easthill Apts.].
Thursday, May 14, 2009
Date change
Because of the Memorial Day holiday, the May 25, 2009 homeowners meeting will be moved to May 18, 2009.
Friday, May 08, 2009
Pool modifications
For many years, the King County Board of Health has been pressuring Easthill Apts. to drain the pool and install three drains (instead of the only one drain, presently in use) in order to comply with current county codes. Recent changes in federal law have now made these changes unavoidable. The Kenthill Townhomes Board has been informed by the owner of Easthill Apartments that these improvements, along with certain other upgrades, will be made to the swimming pool. The work will begin soon and will conclude before the Summer months. More information may be found on this website by viewing the September 02, 2008 blogpost or by clicking on http://kenthillwebblog.blogspot.com/search?q=chlorine .
Thursday, May 07, 2009
Water valves to date
During the past five years, water valves were found to be defective at Buildings A, B, C, D, E, I, J, L, and O. Costs for replacements averaged between $2,000 and $2,500 each. [In order for a water valve to be replaced, the main valve which feeds the entire property plat (both Kenthill Townhomes and Easthill Apartments) has to be turned off. Because of legal and safety requirements, only the City of Kent Fire Department can do this. This requires considerable coordination between the two properties as well as the plumbing company involved, and the project typically takes several days to complete].
Monday, May 04, 2009
Plumbing Projects
This was placed on all six mailboxes:
NOTICE:
KENTHILL TOWNHOMES WILL HAVE THE WATER SHUT OFF TO THE ENTIRE PROPERTY COMPLEX [INCLUDING EASTHILL APARTMENTS] ON THURSDAY MAY 7TH, 2009, BEGINNING AT 8:00AM. THIS IS BEING COORDINATED WITH NEIGHBORING EASTHILL APARTMENTS IN CONJUCTION WITH THE CITY OF KENT AND BEST PLUMBING, INC. THE PURPOSE OF THE WATER SHUT OFF IS TO REPAIR TWO FAULTY WATER VALVES ON KENTHILL TOWNHOMES PROPERTY AT THE NORTH END OF BUILDINGS C AND O. THERE IS A 5:00PM GOAL FOR RESTORING THE WATER BUT IT MAY BE SOONER UNLESS PROBLEMS ARISE. THE TIMIMG OF THESE TYPEs OF REPAIRS CAN BE VERY UNPREDICTABLE. PLEASE BE SURE THAT ALL WATER FAUCETS ARE IN THE OFF POSITION BEFORE LEAVING YOUR UNIT. LEAVING THEM ON ACCIDENTALLY CAN CAUSE EXTENSIVE DAMAGE IF THE WATER IS RESTORED AND A FLOOD OCCURS.
NOTICE:
KENTHILL TOWNHOMES WILL HAVE THE WATER SHUT OFF TO THE ENTIRE PROPERTY COMPLEX [INCLUDING EASTHILL APARTMENTS] ON THURSDAY MAY 7TH, 2009, BEGINNING AT 8:00AM. THIS IS BEING COORDINATED WITH NEIGHBORING EASTHILL APARTMENTS IN CONJUCTION WITH THE CITY OF KENT AND BEST PLUMBING, INC. THE PURPOSE OF THE WATER SHUT OFF IS TO REPAIR TWO FAULTY WATER VALVES ON KENTHILL TOWNHOMES PROPERTY AT THE NORTH END OF BUILDINGS C AND O. THERE IS A 5:00PM GOAL FOR RESTORING THE WATER BUT IT MAY BE SOONER UNLESS PROBLEMS ARISE. THE TIMIMG OF THESE TYPEs OF REPAIRS CAN BE VERY UNPREDICTABLE. PLEASE BE SURE THAT ALL WATER FAUCETS ARE IN THE OFF POSITION BEFORE LEAVING YOUR UNIT. LEAVING THEM ON ACCIDENTALLY CAN CAUSE EXTENSIVE DAMAGE IF THE WATER IS RESTORED AND A FLOOD OCCURS.
Sunday, April 19, 2009
Speak before the meeting
This may be an opportunity to speak with members of the City Council regarding the LID (before the May 19, 2009 meeting downtown). The following is the the City of Kent's website:
Kent City Council to Host Town Hall Meeting KENT, Wash. – April 8, 2009 – The economy, neighborhood livability and economic development are expected to top the list of discussions with council members at a special Town Hall meeting on Thursday, April 23, 5:30-7:30 p.m. in the Training Room at Fire Station 74, 24523 116th Ave. SE. [This fire station is the one located just to the northeast of Kenthill Townhomes, about a mile away].
The Kent City Council is hosting its third in a series of Town Hall meetings so residents can freely and informally speak and ask questions about the issues important to them.
“Town Hall meetings provide an opportunity for residents to come and speak to us in a very casual setting about their concerns, suggestions and hopes for our city,” said Council President Debbie Raplee.
“We started hosting these last fall and participation by the public was terrific,” Raplee said. “The open discussion and hearing from people directly was very valuable to us. We see these meetings as an opportunity to expand our outreach while also increasing residents’ participation in city government.”
Attendees will be invited to submit their questions at the beginning of the meeting, where a moderator will then facilitate discussion.
Contact:Michelle Witham, Community and Public Affairs 253-856-5709 mwitham@ci.kent.wa.us
Kent City Council to Host Town Hall Meeting KENT, Wash. – April 8, 2009 – The economy, neighborhood livability and economic development are expected to top the list of discussions with council members at a special Town Hall meeting on Thursday, April 23, 5:30-7:30 p.m. in the Training Room at Fire Station 74, 24523 116th Ave. SE. [This fire station is the one located just to the northeast of Kenthill Townhomes, about a mile away].
The Kent City Council is hosting its third in a series of Town Hall meetings so residents can freely and informally speak and ask questions about the issues important to them.
“Town Hall meetings provide an opportunity for residents to come and speak to us in a very casual setting about their concerns, suggestions and hopes for our city,” said Council President Debbie Raplee.
“We started hosting these last fall and participation by the public was terrific,” Raplee said. “The open discussion and hearing from people directly was very valuable to us. We see these meetings as an opportunity to expand our outreach while also increasing residents’ participation in city government.”
Attendees will be invited to submit their questions at the beginning of the meeting, where a moderator will then facilitate discussion.
Contact:Michelle Witham, Community and Public Affairs 253-856-5709 mwitham@ci.kent.wa.us
Thursday, March 26, 2009
Information about L.I.D.
The Kenthill Townhomes Board will not be taking a leadership role regarding this issue. The Kenthill Townhomes Board is only composed of four homeowners who volunteer to oversee issues affecting the Kenthill Townhomes Homeowners Association. Therefore, their efforts will likely be ignored by the City of Kent. This issue is with respect to proposed improvements along the S.E. 256th Street corridor. Therefore, it is only going to be affected by the turnout of all of the homeowners, all 82 of the homeowners, who live at Kenthill Townhomes. Only by turning out at the May 19, 2007 City of Kent Council Meeting, together with all the other affected homeowners who live near or along S.E. 256th Street, will the City Council listen. According to the documents recently mailed to all these citizens a 60% protest is needed in order for the City Council to reconsider this proposal, and to stop the formation of a Local Improvement District, and the levying of taxes on all those affected.
That said, a committee of interested and concerned homeowners is being formed and is in its infancy. As information about this committee develops, it will be posted on this Kenthill Townhomes weblog at http://kenthillwebblog.blogspot.com/. As noted above, only individual taxpayers will be given any credibility, so a large turnout is critical. It is suggested that homeowners do all that they can such as doorbelling, carpooling, etc. There will be a certain number of homeowners that simply cannot attend. Two e-mail addresses have been provided for these people to write their representatives. The first is an e-mail address for the City Council. It goes to all the members of the council, not just one. It is citycouncil@ci.kent.wa.us. The second is an e-mail address for the mayor. It is mayor@ci.kent.wa.us
A number of Kenthill Townhomes homeowners attended the meeting held on March 23, 2009 at Kent Meridian High School (there is another meeting scheduled for April 2, 2009 at 4:30; these are “Informational Meetings Only”). When pressed to provide a dollar figure for the average cost to be assessed to individual homeowners for this proposed project, a city official would only say, “…thousands…”
That said, a committee of interested and concerned homeowners is being formed and is in its infancy. As information about this committee develops, it will be posted on this Kenthill Townhomes weblog at http://kenthillwebblog.blogspot.com/. As noted above, only individual taxpayers will be given any credibility, so a large turnout is critical. It is suggested that homeowners do all that they can such as doorbelling, carpooling, etc. There will be a certain number of homeowners that simply cannot attend. Two e-mail addresses have been provided for these people to write their representatives. The first is an e-mail address for the City Council. It goes to all the members of the council, not just one. It is citycouncil@ci.kent.wa.us. The second is an e-mail address for the mayor. It is mayor@ci.kent.wa.us
A number of Kenthill Townhomes homeowners attended the meeting held on March 23, 2009 at Kent Meridian High School (there is another meeting scheduled for April 2, 2009 at 4:30; these are “Informational Meetings Only”). When pressed to provide a dollar figure for the average cost to be assessed to individual homeowners for this proposed project, a city official would only say, “…thousands…”
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Kent Meridian High School
A six page letter from the City of Kent, dated 03-10-09, was mailed on 03-11-09, and received by all 82 homeowners by 03-12-09. It states that numerous improvements will be made to S.E. 256th Street. The letter states that while a grant was obtained which will provide a portion of the needed funds, homeowners adjacent to S.E. 256th Street will also share in the costs, since they stand to benefit from said improvements. Two meetings will be held at the local high school, one on 03-23-09 and one on 04-02-09, to provide for citizen’s questions, comments, and protests. The times for each are 4:30 to 6:45PM.
It is a known fact that for years Kenthill Townhomes Annual Meetings are always held in March, coinciding with the date of typically held monthly homeowners meetings, that being the 4th Monday of the month. The only exception was in 2005, when there was some difficulty during the transition from Phillips Real Estate Inc. over to Suhrco Residential LLC., and the meeting had to be re-scheduled for April. This requirement of holding the Annual Meeting in the first quarter of any given year was actually a part of our old Declarations or Bylaws.
The 2009 Kenthill Townhomes Annual Meeting will not be rescheduled. Many homeowners plan year round to attend this meeting. Two dates are offered for citizens to attend a meeting regarding the road improvements at the local high school. The times for each are 4:30 to 6:45PM. The start time of the Kenthill Townhomes Annual Meeting is 7:00PM.
It is a known fact that for years Kenthill Townhomes Annual Meetings are always held in March, coinciding with the date of typically held monthly homeowners meetings, that being the 4th Monday of the month. The only exception was in 2005, when there was some difficulty during the transition from Phillips Real Estate Inc. over to Suhrco Residential LLC., and the meeting had to be re-scheduled for April. This requirement of holding the Annual Meeting in the first quarter of any given year was actually a part of our old Declarations or Bylaws.
The 2009 Kenthill Townhomes Annual Meeting will not be rescheduled. Many homeowners plan year round to attend this meeting. Two dates are offered for citizens to attend a meeting regarding the road improvements at the local high school. The times for each are 4:30 to 6:45PM. The start time of the Kenthill Townhomes Annual Meeting is 7:00PM.
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
2009 Annual Meeting
The 2009 Kenthill Townhomes Annual Meeting will be held at 7:00PM in the Cabana on March 23, 2009. Homeowners are urged to sign proxies if they are unable to attend. Homeowners may wish to re-read the December 2008 Newsletter (additional copies may be found on the doorstep of Unit J-4).
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
Delinquencies, foreclosures, and bankruptcies
The property management company that handles Kenthill Townhomes is Suhrco Residential Properties, LLC. Suhrco employs numerous property managers who manage properties throughout the Seattle through Auburn area. Each property manager is typically responsible for approximately 12 properties. Recently, the property manager for Kenthill Townhomes made a statement regarding the current financial crisis affecting our region. She said that she is currently spending an ever increasing amount of time managing and keeping current over five hundred delinquencies which cover all of the properties she is managing (only one of which is Kenthill Townhomes). A huge number of these are foreclosures and bankruptcies. She said it was quickly becoming a full time job, keeping up with each an every development, keeping in touch with the attorneys, and staying current on the status of each individual delinquent homeowners legal and financial status.
Monday, March 02, 2009
Hose bibs fourteen
Most of the hose bibs at Kenthill Townhomes are ordinary, standard, non frost free hose bibs. Over the past thirty years, when there was a problem with these hose bibs, such as when they leaked, etc., they were replaced. Some of these were just replaced by ordinary, standard, non frost free hose bibs. But others were replaced by the better, but more expensive frost free hose bibs. These new exterior faucets are “frost-free” meaning the shut off, or point in which water is not exposed to the exterior elements, is within the insulated portions of the house, or in our case, condo, thus minimizing the potential of the faucet to freeze. If the hose bib is of the frost free variety, the process of turning the water on and off drains the remaining small amount of water in the system, and this occurs every time the valve is closed, as the stop itself is located 12 inches or more away from the spout. That distance is usually always inside a wall in a heated space. No additional freeze protection is required.
However, these new frost free hose bibs are not without their faults. They can and do fail, and when this happens, it is almost always because the homeowner did not disconnect and remove the garden hose from the hose bib. Even when this happens during the winter months, garden hoses, having been disconnected by Board members or nearby homeowners, are often reattached by other homeowners to wash their vehicles or to water their plants. Then these garden hoses are not disconnected when they are done. This condition is the Achilles heel of these new frost free hose bibs: All garden hoses must remain disconnected from them during cold weather, otherwise the frost free feature of these hose bibs is defeated; it is simply the way they operate and how they are engineered to work. A garden hose will cause a frost free hose bib to freeze when the water in the garden hose freezes.
[Also, a related piece of information is that the average plumbing company today charges $250 per hour. Not only is this a factor, but this particular task of installing a new frost free hose bib usually (but not always) involves acquiring access to the interior of the Unit. All obstructions, such as hot water heaters or appliances, etc., must be moved out of the way. Then the dry wall or sheetrock inside the Unit must be cut in order for wrenches to be applied to the pipe on the other (the interior) side of the wall, as well as to the hose bib, located on the outside of the wall. Later the dry wall must be repaired, mudded, sanded, and painted. Historically, over the years when this type of project has been undertaken, the total project costs have proven to be very expensive].
However, these new frost free hose bibs are not without their faults. They can and do fail, and when this happens, it is almost always because the homeowner did not disconnect and remove the garden hose from the hose bib. Even when this happens during the winter months, garden hoses, having been disconnected by Board members or nearby homeowners, are often reattached by other homeowners to wash their vehicles or to water their plants. Then these garden hoses are not disconnected when they are done. This condition is the Achilles heel of these new frost free hose bibs: All garden hoses must remain disconnected from them during cold weather, otherwise the frost free feature of these hose bibs is defeated; it is simply the way they operate and how they are engineered to work. A garden hose will cause a frost free hose bib to freeze when the water in the garden hose freezes.
[Also, a related piece of information is that the average plumbing company today charges $250 per hour. Not only is this a factor, but this particular task of installing a new frost free hose bib usually (but not always) involves acquiring access to the interior of the Unit. All obstructions, such as hot water heaters or appliances, etc., must be moved out of the way. Then the dry wall or sheetrock inside the Unit must be cut in order for wrenches to be applied to the pipe on the other (the interior) side of the wall, as well as to the hose bib, located on the outside of the wall. Later the dry wall must be repaired, mudded, sanded, and painted. Historically, over the years when this type of project has been undertaken, the total project costs have proven to be very expensive].
Monday, January 12, 2009
Making up the difference
The following is an excerpt from another website:
"The Association does not have "deep pockets." The only money it generally receives is the assessment payments of the owners. If some of the home owners go into bankruptcy or simply cannot make payment, there will be a budgetary shortfall. Because the budget is determined and then divided amongst the home owners, bad debt will cause a shortfall. It is necessary for the board to determine the anticipated shortfall from bad debt, and to budget accordingly. The past history regarding bad debt can be useful in determining the expected shortfall, but other factors such as the number of cases in collections and the general condition of the economy also may be considered.
"Once one understands that an association budget is nothing more than dividing up the expenses between the home owners, it becomes readily apparent that the failure of one homeowner to pay his or her fair share of the expenses means that his or her neighbors are the ones paying the delinquent owners bills. This is not an acceptable situation. Therefore, the board has a duty to take every reasonable action to collect the assessments. The board may not waive or excuse, or otherwise forbear the payment of assessments. Those home owners who refuse to pay their assessments should be pursued in court, and every reasonable action should be taken to compel payment. Most associations have lien rights in the unit and can foreclose, take ownership or possession of the property, or garnish the wages or bank accounts of the delinquent owners. Most associations have the ability to recover from the delinquent owner, the costs of collection, including attorneys' fees and legal costs. In addition, because it is unfair for some owners to pay on time, and others to cause the Association to incur expense from late payment, it is appropriate for the board to charge a reasonable late charge (in accordance with its governing documents and applicable law)."
"The Association does not have "deep pockets." The only money it generally receives is the assessment payments of the owners. If some of the home owners go into bankruptcy or simply cannot make payment, there will be a budgetary shortfall. Because the budget is determined and then divided amongst the home owners, bad debt will cause a shortfall. It is necessary for the board to determine the anticipated shortfall from bad debt, and to budget accordingly. The past history regarding bad debt can be useful in determining the expected shortfall, but other factors such as the number of cases in collections and the general condition of the economy also may be considered.
"Once one understands that an association budget is nothing more than dividing up the expenses between the home owners, it becomes readily apparent that the failure of one homeowner to pay his or her fair share of the expenses means that his or her neighbors are the ones paying the delinquent owners bills. This is not an acceptable situation. Therefore, the board has a duty to take every reasonable action to collect the assessments. The board may not waive or excuse, or otherwise forbear the payment of assessments. Those home owners who refuse to pay their assessments should be pursued in court, and every reasonable action should be taken to compel payment. Most associations have lien rights in the unit and can foreclose, take ownership or possession of the property, or garnish the wages or bank accounts of the delinquent owners. Most associations have the ability to recover from the delinquent owner, the costs of collection, including attorneys' fees and legal costs. In addition, because it is unfair for some owners to pay on time, and others to cause the Association to incur expense from late payment, it is appropriate for the board to charge a reasonable late charge (in accordance with its governing documents and applicable law)."
Friday, January 02, 2009
Important fact
The post reprinted below was first placed on this webblog on 2006 Monday, October 23, 2006:
"In August [of 2006], the Attorney for the Association was asked numerous questions regarding the authority of the Board with respect to addressing the safety issues of both the dryer vent cleaning project and the chimney cleaning project under the Kenthill Townhomes new revised Declarations and Bylaws, which were recently passed by the homeowners at the Annual Meeting in March 2006. The following are excerpts from the reply given by the Attorney:
"This is in response to your question regarding the cleaning of chimneys and dryer vents. Yes, the Association may enter units to perform any maintenance work to the chimneys and/or dryer vents. It can also assess the costs of such maintenance back to owners.
"Section 13.8 provides that the Association may designate certain objects or appliances in owners' apartments that pose a particular risk of damage to other apartments and/or common area as "High Risk Components."
"Section 13.8.2(a) states that the Board can require inspection of High Risk Components at a specified time."In the event the owner does not cooperate, section 13.8.4(a) states that the Association may enter an apartment and inspect, repair, maintain, or replace the High Risk Component and charge the cost back to the owner as a special assessment, fine the owner and/or sue the owner for injunctive relief.
"As for the portions of the dryer vents and chimneys that lie outside the apartments, owners are still responsible for their maintenance. Section 11.3.1 provides that "owners are responsible for maintenance, repair or replacement of any plumbing fixtures water heaters, fan, air conditioning, heating or other equipment, electrical fixtures or appliances which are located in his or her apartment, or which are for the sole and exclusive use of his or her apartment, whether located in the Apartment or in the Common or Limited Common Areas."
"Since the dryer vents and chimneys are not shared, owners are responsible for their maintenance and any work performed by the Association can be charged back to the owners.
"Please ensure that owners are given advance notice of the entry into their units to conduct the maintenance. The notice should include the date and approximate time of the entry. Let me know if you have any other questions."
"In August [of 2006], the Attorney for the Association was asked numerous questions regarding the authority of the Board with respect to addressing the safety issues of both the dryer vent cleaning project and the chimney cleaning project under the Kenthill Townhomes new revised Declarations and Bylaws, which were recently passed by the homeowners at the Annual Meeting in March 2006. The following are excerpts from the reply given by the Attorney:
"This is in response to your question regarding the cleaning of chimneys and dryer vents. Yes, the Association may enter units to perform any maintenance work to the chimneys and/or dryer vents. It can also assess the costs of such maintenance back to owners.
"Section 13.8 provides that the Association may designate certain objects or appliances in owners' apartments that pose a particular risk of damage to other apartments and/or common area as "High Risk Components."
"Section 13.8.2(a) states that the Board can require inspection of High Risk Components at a specified time."In the event the owner does not cooperate, section 13.8.4(a) states that the Association may enter an apartment and inspect, repair, maintain, or replace the High Risk Component and charge the cost back to the owner as a special assessment, fine the owner and/or sue the owner for injunctive relief.
"As for the portions of the dryer vents and chimneys that lie outside the apartments, owners are still responsible for their maintenance. Section 11.3.1 provides that "owners are responsible for maintenance, repair or replacement of any plumbing fixtures water heaters, fan, air conditioning, heating or other equipment, electrical fixtures or appliances which are located in his or her apartment, or which are for the sole and exclusive use of his or her apartment, whether located in the Apartment or in the Common or Limited Common Areas."
"Since the dryer vents and chimneys are not shared, owners are responsible for their maintenance and any work performed by the Association can be charged back to the owners.
"Please ensure that owners are given advance notice of the entry into their units to conduct the maintenance. The notice should include the date and approximate time of the entry. Let me know if you have any other questions."
Saturday, December 20, 2008
Hose bibs thirteen
What can be done to prevent the pipes from freezing? Absolutely nothing, except to encourage homeowners to keep their Units warm (which we do by the hand-distributed Winter Newsletter). Unless, of course, we want to spend the thousands and thousands of dollars it would take to redesign minor and major structural portions of our buildings, which is fairly unlikely to happen any time in the near future.
Hose bibs twelve
Besides having a 2 year degree in Business, and a 2 year degree in Engineering, I also worked for 7 years in the maintenance department at a structural steel company, so as a matter fact, I do know what I am talking about (smile). But if any owner has any doubts, print out all of the photographs, take them to the nearest HomeDepot of McLendon’s, and find someone there that is trusted. Ask them if what I am writing is true or not.
Hose bibs eleven
I know that I went over these facts when I was on the old Kenthill Board in 2003 and 2004. Although I explained the above facts to them, owners insisted that installing the hose bib protectors did prevent freezing, and, “Were better than nothing.” [I pretty sure I have gone over the above facts with the new Board when the new Board took over in 2005 (and probably since then, in 2006 and 2007)].
Hose bibs nine
If it is for example, 27 degrees outdoors, and there is any gap between the gasket and the wood siding of the building itself of any kind, it will also necessarily be 27 degrees on the inside of the hose bib protector. There is no escaping that fact. Hoses bib protectors are not magical devices, intended to ward off evil spirits of severe cold. The seal between that black soft neoprene and the building itself must be there, with absolutely no leakage, in order for the hose bib protector to capture the (somewhat reduced) warmth from the exterior wall of the building (at that point, probably 40 degrees at the most), and prevent the water inside the hose bib and the water pipe that it is attached to it from freezing.
Hose bibs six
Hose bibs four
Hose bibs one
Wednesday, November 05, 2008
Inflation in our area
Seattle had the highest local inflation rate in the country — 5.8 percent — when the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics last measured our region's prices, in June. [Source: The Seattle Times, Sunday, August 24, 2008].
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Breaking and entering
Another Unit was broken into. Homeowners should consider taking stronger actions, such as alarms systems, etc. A neighborhood Blockwatch program is discussed at every Annual Meeting, but no one has decided to participate.
Sunday, October 12, 2008
Delinqencies
This is from an article in a Seattle newspaper:
Question: When homeowners in our large condominium association fall behind on their dues, our recourse has been to put a lien on the property. Realistically, are there other avenues of recovery we could pursue? Perhaps take them to small-claims court? Or turn them over to a collection agency?
Answer: Has your association been trying to economize by filing liens without a lawyer's help? If so, you've probably figured out that "a lien by itself isn't self-executing," says Mercer Island attorney Kris Sundberg.
In other words, just having a lien doesn't deliver the bucks. Association officers would then have to continue to pursue the delinquent owners.
Alternately, you can take your case to small-claims court. That will put the burden on the board members to file, show up, and present a case - an additional duty they may not be willing to entertain. And even if they do proceed and get a judgment, it won't automatically pay off, which means you must continue to pursue the owner.
As for using a collection agency, be prepared to pay the agency 40 percent or more of anything it collects as service fees.
The final option is hiring an attorney experienced in condominium law.
Question: When homeowners in our large condominium association fall behind on their dues, our recourse has been to put a lien on the property. Realistically, are there other avenues of recovery we could pursue? Perhaps take them to small-claims court? Or turn them over to a collection agency?
Answer: Has your association been trying to economize by filing liens without a lawyer's help? If so, you've probably figured out that "a lien by itself isn't self-executing," says Mercer Island attorney Kris Sundberg.
In other words, just having a lien doesn't deliver the bucks. Association officers would then have to continue to pursue the delinquent owners.
Alternately, you can take your case to small-claims court. That will put the burden on the board members to file, show up, and present a case - an additional duty they may not be willing to entertain. And even if they do proceed and get a judgment, it won't automatically pay off, which means you must continue to pursue the owner.
As for using a collection agency, be prepared to pay the agency 40 percent or more of anything it collects as service fees.
The final option is hiring an attorney experienced in condominium law.
Thursday, October 02, 2008
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
Tuesday, September 02, 2008
Car prowls
The thieves that have been targeting Kent are back. http://www.pnwlocalnews.com/south_king/ken/news/27745784.html
Monday, September 01, 2008
Plumbing problems continue (part 1)
There was a water problem at Building A today. A water pipe or fitting went bad in the wall separating Unit A-5 and Unit A-6. The water was not able to be completely turned off. This is an indication that the water valve at this building is also defective. Water valves were found to be defective at Buildings E, I, J, K, and B during 2005 and 2006. Costs for replacements averaged between $2,000 and $2,500 each. Because the water valve was not able to be completely turned off at the building, the main valve which feeds the entire property plat had to be turned off. This will have to be done again at a later (undetermined as of this writing) time in order to replace the defective valve.
Saturday, August 30, 2008
Thursday, August 28, 2008
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
Asphalt maintenance to occur
Asphalt resurfacing will occur at the southeast shared driveway area on Wednesday, August 27, 2008. This includes the area which lies east and west between 108th Avenue SE & 106th Avenue SE. Every car must be removed from this road. Before 8:00AM on Wednesday. Any car that is not moved from the road will be towed at the owner’s expense. No exceptions. The road will be closed to thru traffic while this work is in progress so an alternate entrance to the property must be used. [Maintenance of these items is considered a shared expense under the Joint Access and Easement Agreement of 1976 signed by both Kenthill Townhomes and Easthill Apts. If you have any questions regarding this notice or the project, please contact the Easthill Apts. Office at 253-854-1820, as they will be the contact persons for the project. Thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter].
Thursday, August 07, 2008
Questions
There have been some questions about the July Newsletter. This is what the Executive Summary from the Reserve Study says:
"Based on this starting point, Your anticipated future expenses, and your historical Reserve contribution rate, we are forced to recommend a (multi-year) Special Assessment of $205,000 in 2006 and a Special Assessment of $225,000 in 2007.
"Additionally, our recommendation is to increase your monthly Reserve contributions [now at $2778 per month] to $4,830 [per month]. with annual inflation offsetting increases thereafter [every year, this figure would also increase, to keep pace with inflation]".
This is the first sentences from the letter to the homeowners about the Reserve Study dated September 7, 2006, that was included in the July Newsletter:
"As you may know, the yearly budget is composed of two parts. The first part is the “Operating Account”, in which funds are placed to address monthly billings, utilities, etc., as well as maintenance issues such as lights, landscaping, etc. The second part is the “Replacement Reserves” Account."
So the $2,778 is what we were putting away over in our Reserve Account each month, saving it up, for things like a roof, etc., after we paid off all our monthly bills, like garbage, sewer and water, insurance, etc., out of our Operating Account. The writers of the Reserve Study were saying that's not enough money to be setting aside and saving up each month, and recommended that it be increased by 75%.
"Based on this starting point, Your anticipated future expenses, and your historical Reserve contribution rate, we are forced to recommend a (multi-year) Special Assessment of $205,000 in 2006 and a Special Assessment of $225,000 in 2007.
"Additionally, our recommendation is to increase your monthly Reserve contributions [now at $2778 per month] to $4,830 [per month]. with annual inflation offsetting increases thereafter [every year, this figure would also increase, to keep pace with inflation]".
This is the first sentences from the letter to the homeowners about the Reserve Study dated September 7, 2006, that was included in the July Newsletter:
"As you may know, the yearly budget is composed of two parts. The first part is the “Operating Account”, in which funds are placed to address monthly billings, utilities, etc., as well as maintenance issues such as lights, landscaping, etc. The second part is the “Replacement Reserves” Account."
So the $2,778 is what we were putting away over in our Reserve Account each month, saving it up, for things like a roof, etc., after we paid off all our monthly bills, like garbage, sewer and water, insurance, etc., out of our Operating Account. The writers of the Reserve Study were saying that's not enough money to be setting aside and saving up each month, and recommended that it be increased by 75%.
Reflection
The following is an excerpt from the letter written to homeowners dated November 4, 2006:
We have also included in the 2007 Budget the estimated cost to continue the inspection/repair of dry rot project, the estimated cost to continue the replacement of entry doors/screen doors project, and the continued commitment to have two roofs installed each year (until all 15 building are completed). In September of 2006, homeowners received a copy of the Executive Summary of the Reserve Study for Kenthill Townhomes that included a listing of 29 major line items which the writers of the study deemed as those which the Association should consider beginning funding. It should be noted that with the exception of the continuing repairs to the wood siding and the ongoing commitment to replace two roofs every year, no monies are presently being set aside to fund these listed items. The Net To Reserves line on the 2007 Budget (bottom of page), the line from which these major expense items are typically taken [and not normal monthly maintenance expenses (the Operating Budget)] only rises by $420.In order to address these needs and meet the above stated objectives, the 2007 Budget includes an approximate 10% increase, effective January 1, 2007. The coupons are included in this mailing – please start using the new coupons as of January 1, 2007.
Sincerely,
The Kenthill Board of Directors
The following is an excerpt from the letter written to homeowners dated November 4, 2007:
We have included in the 2008 Budget the continued commitment to have two roofs installed each year (until all 15 buildings are completed) as well as the installation of gutters & downspouts at these buildings. As covered at the 2007 Annual Meeting, the Board has discussed plans to begin the replacement of all the windows in all the buildings (some already have been replaced by individual unit owners in past years), one building a year, until all 15 buildings are completed, at the conclusion of the Roofing Project. However, these plans have been put on hold, as significant dry rot discoveries and their related repairs have taken precedence.
In 2006, homeowners received a copy of the Executive Summary of the Reserve Study for Kenthill Townhomes that included a listing of 29 major line items that the writers of the study deemed as those which the Association should consider beginning funding. It should be noted that with the exception of the continuing repairs to the wood siding and the ongoing commitment to replace two roofs every year, no monies are presently being set aside to fund these listed items. The Net To Reserves line on the 2008 Budget, the line from which these major expense items are typically taken [and not normal monthly maintenance expenses (the Operating Budget)] must at some point begin to increase to meet these other challenges. In the coming years the Association will have to begin to enlarge the amount on this line in order to set aside monies for the funding of major projects (one of which will be the next painting project).
In order to address these needs and meet the above stated objectives, the 2008 Budget includes an approximate 10% increase, effective January 1, 2008. Coupons and envelopes will be mailed out at a later date. Please begin using the new coupons as of January 1, 2008.
Sincerely,
The Kenthill Board of Directors
We have also included in the 2007 Budget the estimated cost to continue the inspection/repair of dry rot project, the estimated cost to continue the replacement of entry doors/screen doors project, and the continued commitment to have two roofs installed each year (until all 15 building are completed). In September of 2006, homeowners received a copy of the Executive Summary of the Reserve Study for Kenthill Townhomes that included a listing of 29 major line items which the writers of the study deemed as those which the Association should consider beginning funding. It should be noted that with the exception of the continuing repairs to the wood siding and the ongoing commitment to replace two roofs every year, no monies are presently being set aside to fund these listed items. The Net To Reserves line on the 2007 Budget (bottom of page), the line from which these major expense items are typically taken [and not normal monthly maintenance expenses (the Operating Budget)] only rises by $420.In order to address these needs and meet the above stated objectives, the 2007 Budget includes an approximate 10% increase, effective January 1, 2007. The coupons are included in this mailing – please start using the new coupons as of January 1, 2007.
Sincerely,
The Kenthill Board of Directors
The following is an excerpt from the letter written to homeowners dated November 4, 2007:
We have included in the 2008 Budget the continued commitment to have two roofs installed each year (until all 15 buildings are completed) as well as the installation of gutters & downspouts at these buildings. As covered at the 2007 Annual Meeting, the Board has discussed plans to begin the replacement of all the windows in all the buildings (some already have been replaced by individual unit owners in past years), one building a year, until all 15 buildings are completed, at the conclusion of the Roofing Project. However, these plans have been put on hold, as significant dry rot discoveries and their related repairs have taken precedence.
In 2006, homeowners received a copy of the Executive Summary of the Reserve Study for Kenthill Townhomes that included a listing of 29 major line items that the writers of the study deemed as those which the Association should consider beginning funding. It should be noted that with the exception of the continuing repairs to the wood siding and the ongoing commitment to replace two roofs every year, no monies are presently being set aside to fund these listed items. The Net To Reserves line on the 2008 Budget, the line from which these major expense items are typically taken [and not normal monthly maintenance expenses (the Operating Budget)] must at some point begin to increase to meet these other challenges. In the coming years the Association will have to begin to enlarge the amount on this line in order to set aside monies for the funding of major projects (one of which will be the next painting project).
In order to address these needs and meet the above stated objectives, the 2008 Budget includes an approximate 10% increase, effective January 1, 2008. Coupons and envelopes will be mailed out at a later date. Please begin using the new coupons as of January 1, 2008.
Sincerely,
The Kenthill Board of Directors
Saturday, July 19, 2008
Highland Park [part two]
Highland Park [part one]
Tuesday, July 01, 2008
Hedge trimmed
Saturday, June 28, 2008
Dry rot repairs
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Sunday, June 01, 2008
Shared roadways maintenance
Every few years work is done on certain areas of the Easthill Apartments/Kenthill Townhomes shared property plat. This year, this work will be performed again. Small repairs to certain areas of the driveways will occur. Also, the trees which border 106 Ave SE will be trimmed. Maintenance of these items is considered a shared expense under the Joint Access and Easement Agreement of 1976 signed by both Kenthill Townhomes and Easthill Apts. Although contractors are being contacted, the exact dates for the accomplishment of these projects are unknown at this time.
Sunday, May 25, 2008
Memorial Day
For May, the Kenthill Townhomes monthly homeowners meeting falls on May 26th. May 26 is Memorial Day. The homeowners meeting has been changed to Thursday, May 29, 2008 at 7:00PM.
Friday, May 02, 2008
2008 Rough Draft
As stated in previous posts below, during any given year, the homeowners who are present at the Annual Meeting approve the Annual Meeting minutes for the previous year's Annual Meeting. Therefore, the 2008 Annual Meeting minutes will not be approved and mailed out until March of 2009, and only then after the homeowners in attendance at the 2009 Annual Meeting approve them. However, below is an unapproved rough draft of those minutes, based on prepared speech notes by the President:
KENTHILL TOWNHOMES ANNUAL MEETING 03/24/08
Present:Thomas Flynn, Marie Kinney, Nancy LeMay
[The Kenthill Townhomes Annual Meeting uses the Agenda included in the letter mailed to all homeowners announcing the date and time of the Annual Meeting].
The 2008 Kenthill Townhomes Annual Meeting was called to order by the President. A quorum of 25% was eventually achieved after late arriving proxies were obtained. The President gave the Treasurers Report (as the Treasurer was absent). The Association had a very tough year due to the large amount of delinquencies. Using the November 2007 minutes, these were stated to be over $21,000. This does not include the nearly $24,000 cost of attorney fees to pursue homeowners who did not pay their homeowners dues. The process was reviewed again, which includes liens, foreclosures, and eventually the Sheriffs’ Sale, as well as current Washington State law which, after the property goes thru the court system, allow a homeowner to stay in the Unit one year after the Unit is foreclosed on. The President gave the President’s Report. The long term projects of Kenthill Townhomes were reviewed. Kenthill Townhomes received a painting job in 2002 (it was of poor quality). Another painting project will need to be scheduled in the future, but sooner than within a 15 year time span (well before 2017). The window replacement project has also been put on hold indefinitely. Beginning in 2003, we have been replacing roofs, two roofs each year. All scheduling of these projects are now under review. Over the past several years, we have found increasing amounts of serious dryrot on all of our buildings. As the Budget has allowed, repairs have occurred at Buildings K, N, P, A, & R. Serious dryrot has been discovered when the installation of the roofs has occurred, resulting in numerous full sheets of the underlying plywood needing replacement. Severe dryrot has been discovered on the vertical sides above the roofs, resulting in substantial water intrusion. Serious dryrot has been discovered at areas surrounding windows, resulting in at least one entire window system needing replacement. The concrete area to the west of the Cabana, many sections of the concrete area surrounding the swimming pool, the interior lining of the swimming pool (has not been replaced for about 10 years), and the wooden fence which surrounds the swimming pool are all in poor condition. According to the Joint Access and Easement Agreements signed in 1976, Easthill Apartments and Kenthill Townhomes share operating expenses for recreational facilities (with Kenthill paying 40%). A Special Assessment to cover upcoming expenses for possible repairs to these areas is under consideration. Ongoing parking issues throughout the complex were discussed. Two homeowners resigned from the Board. One homeowner present at the meeting was elected to be on the Board.
Homeowner’s discussion:
A homeowners discussion time occurred which included a question and answer time covering the above topics. It was stated that a six page handout regarding the swimming pool issues was distributed (and mailed to off-site owners) to all 82 homeowners in 2006 (and that additional copies are again currently available on the doorstep of Unit J-4).
Meeting Adjourned: At 8:30PM. The next HOA meeting is scheduled for 04/28/08 at 7:00PM.
KENTHILL TOWNHOMES ANNUAL MEETING 03/24/08
Present:Thomas Flynn, Marie Kinney, Nancy LeMay
[The Kenthill Townhomes Annual Meeting uses the Agenda included in the letter mailed to all homeowners announcing the date and time of the Annual Meeting].
The 2008 Kenthill Townhomes Annual Meeting was called to order by the President. A quorum of 25% was eventually achieved after late arriving proxies were obtained. The President gave the Treasurers Report (as the Treasurer was absent). The Association had a very tough year due to the large amount of delinquencies. Using the November 2007 minutes, these were stated to be over $21,000. This does not include the nearly $24,000 cost of attorney fees to pursue homeowners who did not pay their homeowners dues. The process was reviewed again, which includes liens, foreclosures, and eventually the Sheriffs’ Sale, as well as current Washington State law which, after the property goes thru the court system, allow a homeowner to stay in the Unit one year after the Unit is foreclosed on. The President gave the President’s Report. The long term projects of Kenthill Townhomes were reviewed. Kenthill Townhomes received a painting job in 2002 (it was of poor quality). Another painting project will need to be scheduled in the future, but sooner than within a 15 year time span (well before 2017). The window replacement project has also been put on hold indefinitely. Beginning in 2003, we have been replacing roofs, two roofs each year. All scheduling of these projects are now under review. Over the past several years, we have found increasing amounts of serious dryrot on all of our buildings. As the Budget has allowed, repairs have occurred at Buildings K, N, P, A, & R. Serious dryrot has been discovered when the installation of the roofs has occurred, resulting in numerous full sheets of the underlying plywood needing replacement. Severe dryrot has been discovered on the vertical sides above the roofs, resulting in substantial water intrusion. Serious dryrot has been discovered at areas surrounding windows, resulting in at least one entire window system needing replacement. The concrete area to the west of the Cabana, many sections of the concrete area surrounding the swimming pool, the interior lining of the swimming pool (has not been replaced for about 10 years), and the wooden fence which surrounds the swimming pool are all in poor condition. According to the Joint Access and Easement Agreements signed in 1976, Easthill Apartments and Kenthill Townhomes share operating expenses for recreational facilities (with Kenthill paying 40%). A Special Assessment to cover upcoming expenses for possible repairs to these areas is under consideration. Ongoing parking issues throughout the complex were discussed. Two homeowners resigned from the Board. One homeowner present at the meeting was elected to be on the Board.
Homeowner’s discussion:
A homeowners discussion time occurred which included a question and answer time covering the above topics. It was stated that a six page handout regarding the swimming pool issues was distributed (and mailed to off-site owners) to all 82 homeowners in 2006 (and that additional copies are again currently available on the doorstep of Unit J-4).
Meeting Adjourned: At 8:30PM. The next HOA meeting is scheduled for 04/28/08 at 7:00PM.
Saturday, April 19, 2008
Wood siding dry rot repairs
Thursday, April 10, 2008
2008 Annual Meeting handout
This was handed out to all homeowners who were present at the 2008 Annual Meeting:
March 24, 2008
Kenthill Townhomes Homeowners,
Kenthill Townhomes has had many difficulties and has faced several challenges this year. The Board of Directors has been very busy addressing these various issues. Below is an abbreviated list of projects and ongoing projects accomplished in 2007. [Further details concerning these projects may be obtained by viewing the webblog at http://kenthillwebblog.blogspot.com].
1. Worked with certified public accountant to assist in the completion of the required 2006 audit.
2. Continuing to work with our neighbors on all sides to regarding various issues including trespasser and fence problems.
3. Repairs hazardous sidewalks.
4. Continued wood siding repairs to various areas on our buildings that are affected by dry rot.
5. Inspected and approved requests from homeowners for the maintenance (including replacements) of a number of windows, entry doors and screens, in accordance with our new homeowner approved governing documents.
6. Continued to work with arborist to trim trees at our property complex including those which present a hazard during windstorms. These efforts included correspondence with neighboring complexes.
7. Worked with the City of Kent regarding hazardous walkway conditions along 256th St SE. [Note: This roadway is scheduled for major repair/replacement beginning in 2008].
8. In 2006, worked with plumbing contractors to address a record number of significant (and costly) plumbing problems; these included major water leaks discovered at Buildings E, I, J, and L. In 2007, this work continued and included repairs done at Buildings A and B.
9. Continued repairs to outside water faucet hose bibs.
10. Cleaned gutters and downspouts on all 15 buildings, applying moss control on roofs as needed.
11. Worked to address the ongoing issues surrounding delinquencies and foreclosures.
12. Installed new street address signs on those buildings where they had become missing.
13. Painted the concrete curbing which surrounds certain parking islands at various places throughout the complex.
14. Installed new building letter signs on those buildings where they had become missing.
15. Purchased and distributed new, improved Parking Tags for all owners and their tenants.
16. Installed new bark near landscaped areas throughout the complex.
17. Worked with contractors to install new gutters and downspouts on all buildings that have had new roofs installed since the Roofing Project began in 2003. [New gutters and downspouts will be completed at the conclusion of each remaining roof installation from this point forward].
18. New roofs installed on Building N and Building P.
19. New gutters and downspouts installed on Building N and Building P.
20. Major dry rot repairs completed at Building N and Building P.
March 24, 2008
Kenthill Townhomes Homeowners,
Kenthill Townhomes has had many difficulties and has faced several challenges this year. The Board of Directors has been very busy addressing these various issues. Below is an abbreviated list of projects and ongoing projects accomplished in 2007. [Further details concerning these projects may be obtained by viewing the webblog at http://kenthillwebblog.blogspot.com].
1. Worked with certified public accountant to assist in the completion of the required 2006 audit.
2. Continuing to work with our neighbors on all sides to regarding various issues including trespasser and fence problems.
3. Repairs hazardous sidewalks.
4. Continued wood siding repairs to various areas on our buildings that are affected by dry rot.
5. Inspected and approved requests from homeowners for the maintenance (including replacements) of a number of windows, entry doors and screens, in accordance with our new homeowner approved governing documents.
6. Continued to work with arborist to trim trees at our property complex including those which present a hazard during windstorms. These efforts included correspondence with neighboring complexes.
7. Worked with the City of Kent regarding hazardous walkway conditions along 256th St SE. [Note: This roadway is scheduled for major repair/replacement beginning in 2008].
8. In 2006, worked with plumbing contractors to address a record number of significant (and costly) plumbing problems; these included major water leaks discovered at Buildings E, I, J, and L. In 2007, this work continued and included repairs done at Buildings A and B.
9. Continued repairs to outside water faucet hose bibs.
10. Cleaned gutters and downspouts on all 15 buildings, applying moss control on roofs as needed.
11. Worked to address the ongoing issues surrounding delinquencies and foreclosures.
12. Installed new street address signs on those buildings where they had become missing.
13. Painted the concrete curbing which surrounds certain parking islands at various places throughout the complex.
14. Installed new building letter signs on those buildings where they had become missing.
15. Purchased and distributed new, improved Parking Tags for all owners and their tenants.
16. Installed new bark near landscaped areas throughout the complex.
17. Worked with contractors to install new gutters and downspouts on all buildings that have had new roofs installed since the Roofing Project began in 2003. [New gutters and downspouts will be completed at the conclusion of each remaining roof installation from this point forward].
18. New roofs installed on Building N and Building P.
19. New gutters and downspouts installed on Building N and Building P.
20. Major dry rot repairs completed at Building N and Building P.
Saturday, March 01, 2008
2008 Annual Meeting
The 2008 Kenthill Townhomes Annual Meeting will be held at 7:00PM in the Cabana on March 24, 2008. Homeowners are urged to sign proxies [that will be sent out soon] if they are unable to attend. Homeowners are strongly urged to review the Kenthill Townhomes Homeowners Meeting Minutes dated 11/26/07 & 11/29/07 prior to the meeting. Homeowners may wish to re-read the December Newsletter (additional copies may be found on the doorstep of Unit J-4).
Friday, December 14, 2007
Sunday, December 09, 2007
Rate increase
On November 1, 2007, Kenthill Townhomes owners received a letter from the Board regarding the increase in homeowners dues for 2008. In that letter was the following sentence: "The Board has spent the past several months carefully reviewing our financial position. We know that administrative costs are expected to increase 4%, that total utilities are expected to increase 9.56% (excluding a PSE increase; uncertain at this writing)..."
The following news article is an update of that sentence, just published on December 3, 2007:
"Infrastructure investments, higher costs prompt Puget Sound Energy to request general rate increase for late 2008"
BELLEVUE, Wash. -- (December3, 2007) -- Puget Sound Energy [utility subsidiary of Puget Energy (NYSE: PSD)] today filed a request to increase electric and natural gas rates in late 2008. This request would allow the utility to recover large investments made in energy infrastructure in 2006 and 2007, which will continue to be needed to serve the growing region, as well as costs related to higher operating and power-supply expenses.
If approved by the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (WUTC), the general rate case filing would raise PSE’s average electric and natural gas rates by 9.5 percent and 5.31 percent, respectively, effective Nov. 1, 2008.
The following news article is an update of that sentence, just published on December 3, 2007:
"Infrastructure investments, higher costs prompt Puget Sound Energy to request general rate increase for late 2008"
BELLEVUE, Wash. -- (December3, 2007) -- Puget Sound Energy [utility subsidiary of Puget Energy (NYSE: PSD)] today filed a request to increase electric and natural gas rates in late 2008. This request would allow the utility to recover large investments made in energy infrastructure in 2006 and 2007, which will continue to be needed to serve the growing region, as well as costs related to higher operating and power-supply expenses.
If approved by the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (WUTC), the general rate case filing would raise PSE’s average electric and natural gas rates by 9.5 percent and 5.31 percent, respectively, effective Nov. 1, 2008.
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
Possible cost savings
Additional information regarding the difficulties with separating from Easthill Apartments especially with respect to the swimming pool may be found by viewing the posts on this webblog dated, Sunday, July 10, 2005 (a total of three separate posts entitled, "Investigating cost savings [Part one, two and three].